I don't remember Bravo at all, but when I was a teenager, A&E wasn't even a full time network -- at least not with our cable provider. It shared time with Nickelodeon. Nick had that slot during the day and then A&E came on at 8:00 with mostly opera and ballet.
That was called the "Good Old Days". It was around the same time I was walking to/from school uphill(both ways) on my hands in the 6 foot snowdrifts...
Thing is, that didn't bother me as much, because even as MTV (and VH1) moved away from music, other networks (Fuse, MTV2, etc) filled that void. And once those networks shift to other content, we'll have things like Sprocket and MTV4 to take their place.
But nothing has really filled the A&E/Bravo void. Sure, there are networks like IFC and Sundance with arty movies, but nothing with a genuine focus on the arts as a whole.
Amen to that. The rise of neo-hipster Suicide-girls-esque roller derby is all right with me. They've got a team that dresses up like Catholic school girls for God's sake. Really, that's fine. :)
The thing is that channels moving away from what they DO to new things that then get done by other channels and so on and then 5000000 channels and it's STILL ALL SHIT.
It was full-time -- it just depended on the market. Nikelodeon shared space with a local Japanese station where I grew up, while A&E got a priority spot (this was back when we had cable boxes with letters, and A&E had the "A" spot).
On the plus side, thanks to CSI reruns, TNA Wrestling, Bond flicks, and the occasional stroke of genius like Stripperella, I actually now watch the network formerly known as The Nashville Network.
And thanks for responding to my comment about the storms in GA. I was going to post the same question in your journal - I just landed in shadesong's first. Glad to hear you're all good, though.
I have to admit, though, it's a bit surreal to hear about storms somewhere where I don't really know anyone (or, more precisely, haven't met anyone), and yet think "Crap! (insert LJ Friend(s) here) lives there! Are they OK?".
Yes, and I remember when AMC used to show actual "classic" movies, and not stuff like "Sleepless In Seattle" (which is cute, but I wouldn't call it a "classic" by any stretch).
amc was great for what it was back in the day because they showed a lot of the random classic (or "classic") films that ted turner didn't own (douglas sirk, off the top of my head, though i'm sure i can think of better examples). as they transitioned into a network for a younger demographic, i wish they'd focused more on the easy riders/raging bulls era instead of showing the halloween franchise -- or, gasp, the cuaron remake of great expectations -- and passed them off as "classic". big missed opportunity there.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 02:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 02:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 02:55 pm (UTC)Pull the other leg, Spanky.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:00 pm (UTC)Things change.
Not always for the better.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:06 pm (UTC)But nothing has really filled the A&E/Bravo void. Sure, there are networks like IFC and Sundance with arty movies, but nothing with a genuine focus on the arts as a whole.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:08 pm (UTC)The thing is that channels moving away from what they DO to new things that then get done by other channels and so on and then 5000000 channels and it's STILL ALL SHIT.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:34 pm (UTC)*head asplodey*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 03:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 04:20 pm (UTC)And thanks for responding to my comment about the storms in GA. I was going to post the same question in your journal - I just landed in
I have to admit, though, it's a bit surreal to hear about storms somewhere where I don't really know anyone (or, more precisely, haven't met anyone), and yet think "Crap! (insert LJ Friend(s) here) lives there! Are they OK?".
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 04:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 04:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:00 pm (UTC)AMC is another channel that, for me, has gone the MTV route, with TCM and FMC replacing its original function quite nicely.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 06:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 06:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 07:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-04 12:27 am (UTC)God, I'm old...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-04 12:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-04 12:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-04 12:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-04 12:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-04 12:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-04 03:50 am (UTC)