![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Jan. 11th, 2004
Gee, I'm so surprised!
Jan. 11th, 2004 01:06 pmAs first linked by ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
trillian42, ex-Bush boytoy Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill (not to be confused with the former Yankee and Red of the same name) admits that the administration had been planning on invading Iraq from the get-go.
What a shock. The invasion had nothing to do with 9/11 (no matter how many times Dick "I really really really have no financial interest in Haliburton, I just suck their executives' cocks for fun" Cheney says that Saddam was behind the events of that day). It had nothing to do with wanting to get rid of a bad man (there were, and still are, so many folks who are just as bad, if not worse). It had nothing to do with bringing democracy to a people who have been deprived of it (hello, China calling). It had to do with two things: Bush wanting revenge for his Daddy's election loss, and Bush, Cheney, et al wanting to help their industry buddies. Yeah, it did result in getting rid of a bad man, but that was, at best, a pleasant side-effect (and until at least ten years from now, we won't know if Iraq has really become a better place). Every fucking life lost in this war, whether American GI or Iraqi citizen (we'll give the anti-benefit of the doubt and assume that all Iraqi soldiers were loyal to Saddam and therefore supported him completely), was lost for these causes. Anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is either someone with something to lose (read: Cheney or one of his butt-buddies), or someone who's sticking their head in a five-gallon hole filled with ten gallons of shit to drown out the truth.
But hey, look, we're colonizing Mars! Nothing to see here. Move along.
trillian42, ex-Bush What a shock. The invasion had nothing to do with 9/11 (no matter how many times Dick "I really really really have no financial interest in Haliburton, I just suck their executives' cocks for fun" Cheney says that Saddam was behind the events of that day). It had nothing to do with wanting to get rid of a bad man (there were, and still are, so many folks who are just as bad, if not worse). It had nothing to do with bringing democracy to a people who have been deprived of it (hello, China calling). It had to do with two things: Bush wanting revenge for his Daddy's election loss, and Bush, Cheney, et al wanting to help their industry buddies. Yeah, it did result in getting rid of a bad man, but that was, at best, a pleasant side-effect (and until at least ten years from now, we won't know if Iraq has really become a better place). Every fucking life lost in this war, whether American GI or Iraqi citizen (we'll give the anti-benefit of the doubt and assume that all Iraqi soldiers were loyal to Saddam and therefore supported him completely), was lost for these causes. Anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is either someone with something to lose (read: Cheney or one of his butt-buddies), or someone who's sticking their head in a five-gallon hole filled with ten gallons of shit to drown out the truth.
But hey, look, we're colonizing Mars! Nothing to see here. Move along.