It could always be worse
Oct. 14th, 2005 09:17 amI know that some folks, myself included, have expressed some concern over a Pulitzer-winning musical being turned into a movie directed by a hack with no credentials to lead anyone to believe he even knows what a choreographer is.
That said, it could always be worse. Imagine if they turned an even better Pulitzer-winning musical over to an overrated director whose ego was inflated by an undeserved Oscar for a biopic, who then would turn the entire theme of lost souls struggling for the opportunity to dance into a crappy c-rate love story, cut the huge and brilliant multi-song middle number, turn the showstopper into something so mediocre that the Me First and the Gimme Gimmes version has mroe soul, not bring a single one of the show's stars to the screen (including any of the three Tony winners, one of whom would go on to become Emily Gilmore), and bring in Michael Douglas to bulk up the major non-musical role to the point of overshadowing almost everything else.
Nah. Hollywood would never do something that horrible. Right?
That said, it could always be worse. Imagine if they turned an even better Pulitzer-winning musical over to an overrated director whose ego was inflated by an undeserved Oscar for a biopic, who then would turn the entire theme of lost souls struggling for the opportunity to dance into a crappy c-rate love story, cut the huge and brilliant multi-song middle number, turn the showstopper into something so mediocre that the Me First and the Gimme Gimmes version has mroe soul, not bring a single one of the show's stars to the screen (including any of the three Tony winners, one of whom would go on to become Emily Gilmore), and bring in Michael Douglas to bulk up the major non-musical role to the point of overshadowing almost everything else.
Nah. Hollywood would never do something that horrible. Right?