If you're too fucking stupid to understand what a scientific theory is, you don't belong on a fucking school board. I don't give a shit who elected you; the ability to administer an educational system requires education, and if you're sitting there advocating Intelligent Design (aka Creation Science, to call a spade a spade), you are not educated. Get the fuck off the school board and go back to picking nits off the head of your fellow uneducated asswipes. If you really want to contribute to society, go stick your head under a falling rock and put the theory of gravity to the test.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 07:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 07:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 07:14 pm (UTC)Ouch.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 07:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 07:57 pm (UTC)It irks me that the theory has been picked up as a supposed debunker of evolution; it's not and wasn't intended to be so.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 08:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 08:32 pm (UTC)Speaking strictly on the subject of the theory itself as was originally submitted, not as it is put forth by people who don't know the first thing about science; I am not advocating the theory, merely pointing out that if you want to get mad about fools distorting science (as in the note they wanted to put in textbooks warning that evolution is a theory, not fact) it seems disingenuous to ignore the actual theory yourself when putting it down. To whit; are you angry about the idiots or the theory - which you don't agree with I understand - because in this case, the idiots do not represent the science that was proposed.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 08:39 pm (UTC)I worry when I read this too, don't get me wrong, because I can clearly see the reality behind the supposition, but for clarity's sake I don't want to get sidetracked into worrying about the label of the method for sneaking religion into school. At least the proposal of ID allows for generalization and therefore promotes religious tolerance. If I had to choose between ID and straight Christian Creationism (again, which one?) I certainly choose ID, which could more easily be forced to at least acknowledge non-christian beliefs.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 08:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 10:16 pm (UTC)*waves hands*
Date: 2005-03-28 10:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-28 11:41 pm (UTC)Re: *waves hands*
Date: 2005-03-29 08:53 am (UTC)Actually, so do I!
Re: *waves hands*
Date: 2005-03-29 08:56 am (UTC)Then I'd be quite happy with them both.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-29 02:18 pm (UTC)"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture" -- http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050327/lf_afp/uspoliticsreligion_050327225409