Nice golden parachute
Nov. 10th, 2005 10:50 amMike Brown's sixty days of being on the FEMA payroll post-resignation have come to an end.
Of course, at his salary, that's $24.6K for doing nothing for two months (which, technically, could be said about the two months prior to that, as well, but at least he theoretically had responsibilities to shirk back then).
$24.6K for two months of non-work.
The median household income in New Orleans was $31,718.
That works out to a bit over $5k for that same period, assuming they still have jobs (and I know that the latest issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education reported that Dillard and Xavier both cut over half their staff, with LSU still planning some cuts).
Of course, at his salary, that's $24.6K for doing nothing for two months (which, technically, could be said about the two months prior to that, as well, but at least he theoretically had responsibilities to shirk back then).
$24.6K for two months of non-work.
The median household income in New Orleans was $31,718.
That works out to a bit over $5k for that same period, assuming they still have jobs (and I know that the latest issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education reported that Dillard and Xavier both cut over half their staff, with LSU still planning some cuts).
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-10 04:53 pm (UTC)(Bethesda, MD: $107,631; Springfield VA, $88,403)
If we aren't going to get after all this middle-managers in Manhattan, or production-supervisors in Fairfax, for having similar salaries, isn't this a bit disingenuous?
I also can't say Brown wasn't working -- transition of what he wasn't doing to make it look like people actually cared might have put him in the office for 60 hours a week....
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-10 05:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-10 05:25 pm (UTC)If you are attempting to make a comparison locally, you could just as equally picked the income of people that DID help, but are also making lots more than the Median for Nola. Or, pick the people like the LA Governor that had just as hideous an attitude and failed to use their OWN plan to get things going (salary: $95,000, plus residence, transportation, and security detail).
His hideousness has NOTHING to do with his income. The pay goes to the holder of the job. Giving him the job was the error, not paying him some amount relative to poverty in the rest of the country.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-10 09:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 03:12 pm (UTC)Which explains a whole lot more than I care to think about....