Anansi Boys
Nov. 14th, 2005 10:39 amFinished Anansi Boys on Friday, but forgot to post about it.
At first, I was not a fan of the novel. It's no American Gods (which wasn't really the best genre book of its year to begin with, but was much more engrossing from the get-go), but it's fun enough during the first half. Just not that special. Felt rather like Christopher Moore Lite, which would be fine for some authors, but I do expect a little more out of Neil. It's not helped by the fact that Charlie Nancy is, for all intents and purposes, Newton Pulsifer, something it took me nearly half the book to get past.
That said, once the second half kicked in, it grew tremendously as a novel (and given it's trickster themes, I suspect that it's deliberate -- hide the powerful themes under the fluff). I also appreciated some of the wordplay and explorations of what a trickster spirit is, and the ending was quite nicely executed. It's probably his most polished book to date, and it's also got the most distinct narrative voice that Neil's found as a novelist. He's still got work to do to make that final leap as a novelist (at this stage, he's still a better writer of short stories), but I've still got hope.
At first, I was not a fan of the novel. It's no American Gods (which wasn't really the best genre book of its year to begin with, but was much more engrossing from the get-go), but it's fun enough during the first half. Just not that special. Felt rather like Christopher Moore Lite, which would be fine for some authors, but I do expect a little more out of Neil. It's not helped by the fact that Charlie Nancy is, for all intents and purposes, Newton Pulsifer, something it took me nearly half the book to get past.
That said, once the second half kicked in, it grew tremendously as a novel (and given it's trickster themes, I suspect that it's deliberate -- hide the powerful themes under the fluff). I also appreciated some of the wordplay and explorations of what a trickster spirit is, and the ending was quite nicely executed. It's probably his most polished book to date, and it's also got the most distinct narrative voice that Neil's found as a novelist. He's still got work to do to make that final leap as a novelist (at this stage, he's still a better writer of short stories), but I've still got hope.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-14 03:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-14 04:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-14 05:03 pm (UTC)That being said, there's a neat moment near the end where I stopped, said "Wait a minute," and flipped back a few pages to check something out. When I found it and realized what Neil had done (and why), I nodded and said, "You clever bastard."
JSM
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-14 05:48 pm (UTC)The second half just about made up for it all. I do wish he had spent more of the book on the whole trickster god thing because I'm a big fan of that particular archetype
gaiman short stories?
Date: 2005-11-15 12:58 am (UTC)Re: gaiman short stories?
Date: 2005-11-15 01:37 am (UTC)Re: gaiman short stories?
Date: 2005-11-15 02:30 am (UTC)And Smoke and Mirrors is out in a new mass market paperback.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-15 03:34 am (UTC)Personally, I'd much rather go back and reread Neverwhere or Stardust.
Re: gaiman short stories?
Date: 2005-11-15 02:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-15 02:24 pm (UTC)