yendi: (Jason)
[personal profile] yendi
Adam Hughes, artist behind the infamous MJ in a Thong statue, defends himself by noting that, well, golly gee, he didn't mean to craft a ho:

"Is it really a sexist or misogynistic act if it wasn’t intended that way on the part of the people doing it?"

Well, I'm convinced. Surely, unless an artist explicitly declares that he's committing an act of sexism, it's not. Oh no. Why, I bet that some of his best friends are women!

He also does a nice job scoring bingo points, noting that lots of women and feminists tell him how great he is, and that this is the "meanest" he's ever seen this sort of reaction.

Also, media reactions are purely based on wanting to spin this into a big story for money. Why does The Man have to hate poor Adam Hughes so much?

Seriously, I had sympathy for him at the beginning of this (when the sculptors at Sideshow were supposedly to blame, and it was Sideshow that was deleting all comments complaining about it from their site)), but at this point, I've pretty much lost it.

(link ganked from [livejournal.com profile] stevietee)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lokilokust.livejournal.com
what the fuck.
what a fucking piece of shit.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alladinsane.livejournal.com
Very Clintonian...define "sexist"...define "misogynist"...Vast Big Media Conspiracy...yep all there...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robyn-ma.livejournal.com
Is it weird that I look at this and the previously infamous Supergirl statue and the first thing I notice is the hair?

Then again, pretty much the first thing I notice on real live people is their hair. But I'm especially interested in how it's depicted in a sculpt.

I can say the hair on MJ and Supergirl is really cute. Beyond that I've been told I'm supposed to be outraged by the anatomy and/or pose, but I'm just...not. Is the institutionalized cheesecakization of female characters in comics annoying and sexist? Absolutely. It needs to be addressed. So do a lot of things in comics, starting with the fact that white males primarily write them and draw them, and so we're getting white male fantasy a lot of the time. This is also true of just about every other mass medium, not to downplay the extent of it in mainstream comics. I'm just saying the problem goes deeper than just comics and Adam Hughes.

I should also note I don't traffic much in superhero comics these days, and nobody in comics is more stacked than Luba in Love & Rockets; then again, few women in comics have been as complexly written, either.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puppetmaker40.livejournal.com
I can't comment on any of this having known Adam since he was a teenager. He had been best buddies with my brother and his wife for years. All I can say is that this is such a tempest in a teapot and it is getting stirred by the internet and the media making much more of it than it is. The statue is not to my taste but then I accept that not all art work is going to appeal to me.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texmorgan.livejournal.com
It's times like this I wish the guy would just balls up and say "Hell yeah, look at the rack on that baby and damn can she worth that ass."

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asim.livejournal.com
OMYGOD.

This sucks on top of sucking with a big creme de la suck on top.

Lo, How The Mighty Have Fallen (from my approval).

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texmorgan.livejournal.com
Also, I would like to Kirsten Dunst for anything henceforth Spiderman related.

An example:
"Did you see Spiderman 3?"
"Nope."
"Why not?"
"I heard it sucked and it has Kirsten Dunst."
"Yeah, she ruins everything."
"Did you see Spiderman 2 at least? It was really good."
"Still has Kirsten Dunst and even Alfred Molina can't balance that out."

Fast forward a few years:
"Did you see Marie Antoinette 2?"
"Kirsten Dunst sucks but it was great to see her head lobbed off and then put back on just to get lobbed off again. I could watch that scene on loop for hours."

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asim.livejournal.com
I accept that not all art work is going to appeal to me.
I understand. I even defended Adam (http://yendi.livejournal.com/1272140.html?thread=9529420#t9529420) initially, based upon a number of factors. At the same time, with this article, I think Adam is being, at best, naive about the commentary, loud and obnoxious as it can be. Anger is like that, sometimes, sadly.

However. This statement of yours is similar, in my mind, as to how people defend various other offensive commentary. Everyone has the right to do this art, of course. But said right also allows people to discuss it, even in a highly negative light. And yes, there is a point where the much-maligned "PC" stops, and actual harm to a group begins. I think the status hits it, and that it's not just about the statue, but about the overall state of women in the comics industry, and how the statue reflects it.

By itself, the statue is just...tacky and tasteless. But put it with the other acts where women are marginalized in comics. And this is the real point: the statue is flash point of a trend of such actions, and that trend is accelerating. It's harmful not just women, but to the comics industry as a whole.

Does that make sense?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 04:52 pm (UTC)
amokk: (OMGOHNOZ drama)
From: [personal profile] amokk
Duh, [livejournal.com profile] yendi, you just took it the wrong way. Gah.

Again, not a True Fan!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] songwind.livejournal.com
While I know that the subjects being raised by this situation are serious, and there is real meat to the various points to ponder...

my first reaction to everyone of these posts is, "You know, my wife does my laundry in a thong."

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asim.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] yendi is correct. Please accept my apologies.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asim.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] yendi is correct. Please accept my apologies.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emilytheslayer.livejournal.com
That just means you're lucky.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] songwind.livejournal.com
Plus she's a complete control freak about the washing machine.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texmorgan.livejournal.com
You know I remember watching that film and really liking it but I don't remember anything about Kirsten Dunst in it. Denise Richards on the other hand, I do. I think that has more to do with the fact I was dating a girl at the time that looked exactly like Denise Richards but a little more top heavy.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texmorgan.livejournal.com
or his wife uses thongs as her laundry day pair.

Profile

yendi: (Default)
yendi

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags