This article, regarding the casting of Sienna Miller in the G.I. Joe film, describes her role as, "a raven-haired baroness and sexy femme fatale skilled in espionage."
That would, of course, make her Baroness.
But the article calls her the film's female lead.
Um?
So they're either seriously re-writing Scarlett's backstory, or the article got something wrong.
Or they're having Baroness make a serious face turn.
Granted, I haven't followed the Devil's Due revival of the line (tried one issue, found that it sucked even more than most comics nowadays, and didn't bother after that). Maybe there's a retcon I'm missing.
That would, of course, make her Baroness.
But the article calls her the film's female lead.
Um?
So they're either seriously re-writing Scarlett's backstory, or the article got something wrong.
Or they're having Baroness make a serious face turn.
Granted, I haven't followed the Devil's Due revival of the line (tried one issue, found that it sucked even more than most comics nowadays, and didn't bother after that). Maybe there's a retcon I'm missing.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:12 pm (UTC)Maybe it's a case of "we tell every actress she's the lead so she'll do the movie".
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:14 pm (UTC)Okay, if it's the Variety one... it sounds like that The Baroness character will have more face time then any female they might hire for Scarlett, if they even have a Scarlett.
The plot alone is retarded although "necessary". I don't have much trust in the writers or directors here though. Their track record is faulty and with working with such a major franchise... sccccaaaaareeed I am for something worse than Transformers and I haven't seen Transformers yet to even know how bad or good Michael bay really did that.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:20 pm (UTC)I have complete faith that the Joe movie will blow (and the commercials for Transformers, along with Bay's track record, were more than enough to keep me away from that one).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 04:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 03:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 02:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 03:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 04:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 07:50 pm (UTC)