Sometimes it's NICE when things don't have sequels. Let it simmer in and become part of the great societal unconcious for a few decades and then let people start bringing new takes on it, but JEEBUS, why a sequel?
The Director's Cut changed so much** from the original film that it's basically a new film, a new version of how it shows what happens.
**he even removed some scenes and changed the visuals, sound effects, music and added new scenes, as well as deleted for time scenes.
I just wish they had packaged it with the original theatrical release instead of the useless second disc of offputting nutjob fan material and "how we chose these locations" extras.
The story has been told and it is finished. A stand alone film. THere is absolutely no need for a sequel.
They've already wanted to colourize or remake films like Casablanca, etc. Are they now going to insist on a Casablanca 2 or a Gone with the Wind 2 or Citizen Kane 2
Your comment appears on my screen as a set of evenly lengthed short lines. It looks like a poem. Bits of it even rhyme. =:o} (I'm guessing it's a side effect of whichever editor/client you use...?)
I'm not the most perceptive film viewer on the planet, but I sort of thought the world ended at the end of the first movie. Or maybe just the rabbit died...?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 08:03 pm (UTC)Don't post much but I do read you pretty religiously.
Thanks for all the good info.
Will
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 08:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 08:04 pm (UTC)Sometimes it's NICE when things don't have sequels. Let it simmer in and become part of the great societal unconcious for a few decades and then let people start bringing new takes on it, but JEEBUS, why a sequel?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 08:34 pm (UTC)The Director's Cut changed so much**
from the original film
that it's basically a new film,
a new version of how it shows what happens.
**he even removed some scenes
and changed the visuals, sound effects,
music and added new scenes,
as well as deleted for time scenes.
I just wish they had packaged it with the
original theatrical release instead of the
useless second disc
of offputting nutjob fan material
and "how we chose these locations" extras.
The story has been told and it is finished.
A stand alone film.
THere is absolutely no need for a sequel.
They've already wanted to colourize or remake
films like Casablanca, etc.
Are they now going to insist on a Casablanca 2
or a Gone with the Wind 2 or Citizen Kane 2
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 10:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-10 03:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-10 04:00 pm (UTC)(I'm guessing it's a side effect of whichever editor/client you use...?)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-10 08:32 pm (UTC)it's easier to read.
Thanks :)
I don't use a client,
always work within LJ in real time.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-11 04:40 pm (UTC)or a Gone with the Wind 2 or Citizen Kane 2
ummm
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108915/
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-11 05:46 pm (UTC)Huh, i guess any comment i could make
about the lack of imagination prevailing
in Hollywood would rather rhetorical :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-11 06:00 pm (UTC)Absorbs light, gold, and glamor
Creative thought....safe
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 09:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-09 09:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-10 12:42 am (UTC)What a monumentally bad idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-10 03:09 am (UTC)