So, of the three good critics out there, only Roger Ebert actually got to review Signs. His review is at http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/wkp-news-signs02f.html and it's a rave.
And unlike most critics, he's capable of writing a review without spoiling the movie (he makes some oblique references that folks who have already seen the film will get, but that's all).
Now, I'd like to know what the fuck the editors at EW and the NY Times were thinking by not assigning Lisa Schwartzbaum and Elvis Mitchell to this film.
And unlike most critics, he's capable of writing a review without spoiling the movie (he makes some oblique references that folks who have already seen the film will get, but that's all).
Now, I'd like to know what the fuck the editors at EW and the NY Times were thinking by not assigning Lisa Schwartzbaum and Elvis Mitchell to this film.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-02 02:20 pm (UTC)A signs community.
Date: 2002-08-10 12:01 am (UTC)Hugs, wolfieboy.