On crushes and privacy
Oct. 14th, 2003 07:13 amYou know, I'm damned glad I never took that crush meme. Because now, the person who wrote it is violating the privacy of everyone who took it. And although his "Boo Fucking Hoo" response may be accurate (why give out information to someone you can't trust), it doesn't make him any less of an asshole.
And no, I'm not paying him $4 for the results. He doesn't deserve the money. You shouldn't pay him, either.
As for the totals:
And no, I'm not paying him $4 for the results. He doesn't deserve the money. You shouldn't pay him, either.
As for the totals:
Who has a crush on yendi?The below numbers indicate what sorta crushes yendi's friends have on him, as taken from the results of the original LJ Secret Crush Meme.Questions? Please read the FAQ. |
6 people have a Secret Crush on yendi. 3 people have a Public Crush on yendi. 2 people have an Ex-Crush on yendi. |
| How many people have a crush on you? |
yendi
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 04:25 am (UTC)Selling the results is ridiculously cynical. If he was trying to make a point, there are better ways to do so. If he's in it for the money, there are likewise better ways. Feh.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 05:01 am (UTC)I don't remember if I took the original crush meme or not. But yeah, that's pretty damn harsh that he's turning around and charging people for results. I wonder if anyone can sue.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 06:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 06:04 am (UTC)On another note: how the hell did I end up with 3.5 secret crushes. anyway?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 06:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 07:32 am (UTC)I wish that someone else would do a similar meme, one that's updated regularly and that respects the privacy of the participants. Jackass.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 07:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 08:55 am (UTC)Also, only two people like me anyway. *pouts*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 10:47 am (UTC)Actually did he ever SAY the information would be kept private? Cause frankly if he didn't? It is no one's fault but the people who put info in there to assume it WOULD be private. He is under no obligation to keep it that way.
Frankly I think it's hysterical he's doing this. Maybe it'll stop people from spreading every "ohhh shiny click this!" they find. If so? He has done a public service.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 10:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 11:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 11:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 11:49 am (UTC)Glad I use an OS where that sort of thing is impossible. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 11:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 11:52 am (UTC)What would be interesting to see is how many people actually pay for it...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 11:54 am (UTC)They make an ass out of u and... mptions.
Hrm...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 11:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 12:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-14 01:29 pm (UTC)Just because things run doesn't mean they get installed. ;)