yendi: (Default)
[personal profile] yendi
So, eight more days, and the horror is in the air. Our Simpsons reruns are almost all Treehouse of Horror episodes now. Life is good.

So, what's your favorite horror remake? I've got a few favorites: John Carpenter's version of The Thing is at the top of the heap, of course. But props should also be given to the under-appreciated Dark Castle redo of The Haunting of Hill House, as well as to Evil Dead II, which is basically just Sam Raimi remaking his own movie.

And the worst? Two obvious ones are the remakes of Psycho and The Haunting, two movies that were damned near perfect the first time.

Of course, this isn't even counting the near-infinite takes on Dracula, which range from great to atrocious.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 05:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerel.livejournal.com
I'm still trying to figure out why they felt it necessary to remake "Psycho." Shot-for-shot even.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 05:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shawnj.livejournal.com
Best: Cape Fear
Worst: Night of the Living Dead

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] willeonabe.livejournal.com
Well I have to say that I like Bram Stoker's Dracula (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103874/) with Keanu, Winona, Sir Anthony, and Gary Oldman. Very well done if you ask me.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bassfingers.livejournal.com
Sorry, I thought it had nothing to do with Bram Stoker's original story. I mean, what, having the good old count fall in love with Lucy because he thought she was his reincarnated wife or something? Come on...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] willeonabe.livejournal.com
Well I personally have never read the original story, so I can't comment whether the movie accurately follows the book, but one its own merits is where I find the move down well.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bassfingers.livejournal.com
Don't forget the big green guy with the bolts in his neck. Not only do you have Young Frankenstien, but I remember enjoying Roger Corman's Frankenstein Unbound (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0099612/combined). Also good was Son of Frankenstein (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0031951/combined) (I loved the sets...). You could even call Ken Russell's telling in Gothic (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0091142/combined) a retread, if you wanted.

Then you've got the furry guys. An American Werewolf in London is still high on my list, and I didn't mind An American Werewolf in Paris too much either.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bassfingers.livejournal.com
I guess I just expected that it would follow the book since they had the gall to go out of their way to call it "Bram Stoker's Dracula." Really it was "Francis Ford Copola's Dracula" and should be called such, in my mind.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com
I like Andy Warhol/Paul Morrissey's Dracula and Frankenstein!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dorei.livejournal.com
Would it be incredibly wrong of me to say Abbot & Costello Meet the Mummy? :)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 06:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iresprite.livejournal.com
They're doing a midnight showing of Evil Dead 2 at the Fenway theatre in town on halloween! Whoo! I cannot wait.

Wow...

Date: 2003-10-23 06:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eng1ne.livejournal.com
I've actually seen all of those. And I'm not a big horror movie fan.

Did you see "From Beyond" with the tuning forks and the pineal gland? Now thats fun camp!

Also, there's "Lifeforce". Not scary, but riveting for pretty much one reason. And it ain't Patrick Stewart. Or is it?

The movie that scared me the most actually, was the original "Poltergeist."

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canonfire.livejournal.com
shitty as the third remake was, ANY version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers succeeds in scaring the shit out of me.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auryn29a.livejournal.com
I think _Dracula 2000_ was very underrated.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melaniesuzanne.livejournal.com
I liked Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0109836/).

We're them and they're us. It's hopeless.

Date: 2003-10-23 07:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pinballsorceror.livejournal.com
Mine has to be the 1990 remake of "Night of the Living Dead". I think Tom Savini took a solid classic and made its intent even clearer and the characters far more articulate. It would be my favorite zombie film too, although Dawn of the Dead probably deserves that title.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 07:32 am (UTC)
ext_3294: Tux (Default)
From: [identity profile] technoshaman.livejournal.com
Not being nearly as into horror as some folks, I'm a big fan of "The Lost Boys".... while it's got nothing to do with the classic Dracula story, it's got a lot of archetypical elements: a classic initiation sequence, including falling in love with the antiheroine (can you say, Nimue/Morrigan?), the struggle for the lead vamp to perpetuate the species, and a deus ex machina twist to the denouement... and it's just fun.

I said it wasn't a horror flick. But it is a vamp flick...

One thing I never could stomach about living in Santa Carla.

All the damn vampires.



(And Echo and the Bunnymen's job on "People are Strange" is one of the best covers ever... really got Jim Morrison's style, and made it cleaner...)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 07:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olliesmama.livejournal.com
I actually liked the remake of The Haunting, but that had nothing to do with the cinematic value as it did with the fact that I have quite the thing for Liam Neeson. *blush*

However, I agree with you from yesterday, Red Dragon sucked compared to Manhunter.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 08:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shawnj.livejournal.com
They star Udo Kier (http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001424/), it's impossible not to like them.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 09:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unwilly.livejournal.com
Fred just needed to whore himself out, as he had run out of Beserker stories.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unwilly.livejournal.com
Y'know I didn't like the cinematography on Manhunter, which made it hard for me to like the movie. I might like it more now that I see Willam Petersen every week on CSI.

It was much better and more faithful to Harris' book than Red Dragon.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 10:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
I agree with you about the title entirely, but [livejournal.com profile] willeonabe and I agree on the whole. Even though he (Francis) pulled out a non-canonical motivation for Dracula, I think they got the period tone/feel beautifully, and for ONCE we saw all of Lucy's suitors.

The art direction makes me swoon.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olliesmama.livejournal.com
*nods* That's what I thought too.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 10:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
Same cinematographer did the whole run of Miami Vice, too. Lots of familiar names between the two projects.

But I have the sneaking suspicion the fascination with forensic investigation stuck with Petersen the whole time... until C.S.I.

Re: We're them and they're us. It's hopeless.

Date: 2003-10-23 10:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pinballsorceror.livejournal.com
I thought the strengthening of the female character was really crucial to the atmosphere of the story. That and Tom Savini's loving treatment of the material was something special. Definetely a sound remake. I also thought it was kind of funny that they have the copyright to the material since they accidentally didn't copyright the original.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] felisdemens.livejournal.com
hmm. remakes remakes remakes...

I would have to say the 1982 Cat People is my favorite remake. Yes, it was crap, but it was crap that I enjoyed. The 1942 original is excellent as well.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 01:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olliesmama.livejournal.com
Speaking of which, the cast of CSI will be on Oprah in less than an hour.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olliesmama.livejournal.com
*pouts*
Actually, it was just Marg Helgenberger and a bunch of real life CSIs...interesting, but I was so hoping to see Billy Petersen..for more than thirty seconds. LOL

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
I know this is diverging a bit, but the scariest movie I have ever seen -- and I'm the kind that usually looks at it, goes 'hmmm' and starts to figure the SFX behind the 'boo' -- is John Carpenter's Prince of Darkness.

The abruptness at both ends, the King-like lack of reason for horrible things happening, the sheer despair of it all... shudder.

It was seeing most of that and then They Live that made me realise the guy wasn't making movies any more... he was fixing nightmares on celluloid.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unwilly.livejournal.com
That piece of crap? Horrible, horrible.

I read one book and pretty much tossed him as a writer.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-24 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olliesmama.livejournal.com
The Company of Wolves is great! What did you think of Wolfen?? The book was much better than the movie, but it was still an interesting spin on the lupine take.
And An American Werewolf in Paris was kind of freaky, and didn't seem much like a sequel.

Profile

yendi: (Default)
yendi

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags