How's that for Justice?
Nov. 13th, 2003 02:36 pmRoy Moore has been removed from office. Which is not to give us too much hope that the country is moving in a vaguely forward direction again (one small step forward after ten leaps back doesn't amount to a hell of a lot), but it's something.
My favorite part of the article is when Moore says ""I have done what I was sworn to do." Um, no. He did exactly what he was sworn not to do. Or did he forget that oath he took?
My favorite part of the article is when Moore says ""I have done what I was sworn to do." Um, no. He did exactly what he was sworn not to do. Or did he forget that oath he took?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-13 11:48 am (UTC)Uh...no. Regardless of what our founding fathers may have personally believed, they built our system on an absence of religious influence.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-13 11:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-13 01:46 pm (UTC)Moore said he would discuss the possibility of an appeal with his lawyers and could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review his removal, arguing that it violates the Constitution's ban on religious tests as a qualification for office.
If he can't uphold his oath of office without acknowledging God, why would he seek refuge in a Constitutional ban on religious tests as a qualification for office?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-13 02:16 pm (UTC)I would not be surprised if he becomes a senator or the governor of Alabama within the next couple of elections... Somewhat sickened, but not surprised.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-13 06:05 pm (UTC)...Not that displaying a 5-ton monument to the Judeo-Christian belief system in a US Court of Law is hypocritical, or anything. That whole Establishment Clause with its separation of church and state is fiddle faddle.