Bush's save the family proposal
Jan. 16th, 2004 09:34 amI wonder if Bush's Save the Family proposal includes advice on not spending money on Japanese prostitutes. Hey, come to think of it, Neil Bush isn't doing anything -- he could head up the commission! Maybe hire Newt Gingrich and Karl Rowe to be on the board. Bet they could save a hell of a lot of marriages that way.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 07:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 08:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 08:42 am (UTC)What about actually providing resources for healthy relationships? Or promoting honesty, fairness, and compassion? Those would go a long way, I imagine.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 09:13 am (UTC)promoting honesty, fairness, and compassion? Those would go a long way, I
imagine.
Heaven forbid they ever do THAT.
For as long as I can remember, lawmakers have been about making laws that force an issue or curtail someone's rights (victimless crimes, and such) without ever even considering dealing with the underlying problems that cause the issue in the first place. Why change now?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 09:23 am (UTC)Granted, that's a rhetorical question, but if we don't stop, more people will be harmed. That said, it's generally not the lawmakers who end up reacting to these pressures primarily, but us little peeps down here. People shoulder the responsibility in art, in outreach programs, whatever.
So. Promote that stuff, yeah?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 09:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 09:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-16 09:33 am (UTC)I remember Silverado Banking.
Bleah.
Date: 2004-01-16 06:11 pm (UTC)We aren't blocking *any* domains or IP addresses on this end. I don't see how it could be from our end since his connection obviously worked earlier in Beta1, yet doesn't now and we haven't changed anything since then.
_________________
-Jeff / Jintek
Lord of Strife