That zombie kid
Mar. 2nd, 2005 01:40 pmAny number of you have linked, with appropriate outrage, to articles about the kid who wrote a zombie story and got arrested because his grandparents, the Winchester County police (including at least one subhuman named Steven Caudill), judge, and prosecutors are all inbred assholes who spend their time felching rabid greyhounds instead of, say, doing their jobs.
robyn_ma has one of the best ideas I've heard in response: Wouldn't it be cool if George Romero, Edgar Wright/Simon Pegg, and other famous zombie creators got together and did a zombie anthology book, the proceeds of which would go to pay this kid's bail?
Of course, having read Toe Tags, I'm not sure I want Romero attempting fiction again, but otherwise, I love the idea (and I'd add David Schow as a must-have author for any such anthology).
Of course, having read Toe Tags, I'm not sure I want Romero attempting fiction again, but otherwise, I love the idea (and I'd add David Schow as a must-have author for any such anthology).
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 07:22 pm (UTC)Very good idea on your part, though!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 07:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 09:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 09:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 10:25 pm (UTC)*is in the wrong profession*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-03 02:57 am (UTC)Here's the bit - we only have his word that it's just a story. And, um, he's in jail and committed a crime if it's not. Now, I think it probably is as well, and I find the idea that writing about things that haven't happened and keeping the writings in your residence could be a crime offensive, but there is a concern. We can't assume that it's not a threat, not without reading the "fiction" at issue.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-03 01:01 pm (UTC)Hello? Presumption of innocence? And what about violation of privacy? The story was in his journal, ergo his private papers. This case shouldn't have made it to arrest.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-03 02:14 pm (UTC)First, presumption of innocence is a legal fiction that entitles you to due process. The police, prosecutors, and the general public can reach conclusions about you all they want. In fact, an ethical prosecutor will be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt before he or she files a complaint.
Second, he does not own or rent the house, I believe. If he doesn't, the people who do can consent to a search of his belongings. It's also not clear whether they searched themselves, which is also legal, if unethical.
Again, I am very uncomfortable with the situation, but that doesn't mean that it's necessarily a horrible miscarriage of justice.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-03 07:19 pm (UTC)~S