yendi: (Default)
[personal profile] yendi
So, with [livejournal.com profile] docorion in town this weekend (and thus keeping [livejournal.com profile] shadesong occupied), I had something I relish and almost never get -- the house to myself!

Which meant I could accomplish all the things I've been meaning to do: Sitting around in my underwear, playing the PS2 without interruption, and watching Bond movies. :-)

Two of those were the two best Roger Moore movies (The Spy Who Loved Me and For Your Eyes Only, if you really had to ask)

And I did something I swore I'd never do again: I watched License to Kill.

I'd sworn never to watch it again, even if it was included in the one Bond DVD box set I got before they went out of print again (and that, more than anything else, is why I want the new Casino Royale to ramp up production, so I can complete my collection). But after [livejournal.com profile] averyslave's recent look at the Bond series failed to rank it last or even in the bottom five, I figured I'd give it another go.

Conclusion: Still the worst Bond ever.

Oh, there are good moments, and good intentions (until Brosnan, Dalton was the only Bond actor who'd ever channeled rage into the part), but that's about it.

The flaws start with the villains, from the hyper Beicio Del Toro as a young punk to the overparanoid drug lord played by Robert "Mr. Bad Movie" Davi who trusts nobody he's known forever, but does trust the mysterious ex-British agent he meets under mysterious circumstances who sneaks out of his place. Throw in Wayne Fucking Newton as a corrupt new-age spiritualist, Anthony Zerbie as the drug-running middleman, and (most annoying of all) Anthony Starke (yes, Tony Stark -- it's Iron Man!) as Truman-Lodge, the most annoying bean-counter ever, and you've got a group of bad guys who could put The Tick's Mr. Exciting to sleep.

Then there are the assorted plotholes, from the killing of Sharkey (which, while well-deserved in the sense that he was an annoying and useless character, and also good for angering Bond, made no sense, in that if the bad guys tracked him down and figured out that he was in on the first drug raid, how did they not catch Bond's involvement?), to the bank that lets the corrupt president know about a huge new deposit, but not a large withdrawal, to tacked-on plotlines involving a drug bust and a missile deal that are there solely to delay Bond's revenge. Add in Robert Brown's M (worst M ever), the whole "Q is officially unofficially helping" crap, the ludicrous opening scene (sure, they'll fly a chopper to block a wedding and get one more guy for a raid, because, you know, those FBI guys don't have partners or entire teams to handle things), and, just to make us walk out of the theatre really wanting to kill ourselves, Patti LaBelle's "If You Asked me To" playing inexplicably over the closing credits, and you've got a film that makes me want to dangle my feet in a shark tank.

The few things that I liked: Both Bond girls were fun, if nothing special. And, unusually, both lived (of course, no mention is made of the fact that both of them spent some serious time helping drug lords -- that fact gets overlooked just a wee bit). The underwater scenes here are actually amongst the best in any Bond flick, with realistic fights and Bond not playing superhero. And Bond's flambéing of the drug lord is quite nice (even if it comes after one of the silliest chase scenes in the series). And I do love Felix as a character. But that's way too little for me. Seriously, bad as some of the other flicks in the series have been, they all have more going for them than this one.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 01:23 pm (UTC)
ext_9: (Default)
From: [identity profile] zarhooie.livejournal.com
But are they Beaker underwears? :P

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robyn-ma.livejournal.com
'I take great pride in my collection of boxers'

Do you have them filed alphabetically in longboxes and sealed in Mylars? :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crystalrowan.livejournal.com
Off topic, but I believe you're an MST3K buff. Did you ever see the movie they did that was about a guy living in this Utopian society who finds a can of Old Milwaulkee which leads to the discovery that the Utopia they live in is actually a facility for the breeding of clones of famous and rich individuals in "the real world"? I am trying to remember the name of that movie as I'm 99% sure The Island is a remake of that movie. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crystalrowan.livejournal.com
Oh wow! I assumed it was a straight-out remake since the plots were so similar. They might have a pretty good case. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wjf.livejournal.com
I just gotta say, that was the movie that put me in lust with Carey Lowell. Have never quite lost that, either. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stevietee.livejournal.com
You don't see a hint of rage in Connery's depiction?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unwilly.livejournal.com
Best Rooger Moore?

No such animal exists.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unwilly.livejournal.com
We must agree, to disagree.

I will say that I found Moore tolerable as the Saint.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-26 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] averyslave.livejournal.com
Are you referring to For Your Eyes Only? "YOLT" would be You Only Live Twice, a Connery.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terracinque.livejournal.com
Conclusion: Still the worst Bond ever.

How can you possibly say that, when Casino Royale and View To A Kill are still out there, waiting to suck for any unsuspecting fool reckless enough to rent them?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-25 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terracinque.livejournal.com
Moonraker is pretty sucky too. In fact, if I'd thought of it I'd have put it in the sentence with the other two.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-26 12:36 am (UTC)
phantom_wolfboy: (observations)
From: [personal profile] phantom_wolfboy
until Brosnan, Dalton was the only Bond actor who'd ever channeled rage into the part

ooooh, nice catch. I hadn't thought of it in those terms, but you're right, and you hit the nail on the head for why I like Brosnan as Bond.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-26 01:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] averyslave.livejournal.com
I put some extra thought into it, and I still can't see "Licence" being the worst. "A View To A Kill" and "Moonraker" are just too damaged to live. And if given the choice between a seriously flawed "Licence to Kill" and a completely pointless "The Living Daylights", I'd choose "Licence" every time.

I will admit there is a little play in my countdown around the bottom four, five, and six. Arguably, I could put "Licence" under "You Only Live Twice", but Bond as a Japanese fisherman gets me every time.

Either way, no argument on "Licence" being bad. I just consider both of Dalton's Bonds to be much better than Moore at his worst. Dalton was so underrated as Bond, but was such a departure from Moore that he was doomed to failure even before the cameras rolled. If a young Dalton was following Pierce today, we'd probably accept him more easily.

Profile

yendi: (Default)
yendi

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags