yendi: (Default)
[personal profile] yendi
Elayna and her friend are in the kitchen talking, and Elayna's friend recounts the misreported story about the peanut-allergic girl in Quebec who suffocated when her boyfriend kissed her after eating a PB&J sandwich.

Elayna's response: "That's the problem with having a boyfriend. You die!"

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-01 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ewin.livejournal.com
WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE SECRET... TO IMMORTALITY.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-01 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zevhonith.livejournal.com
I have a friend with a peanut allergy so bad he had to throw up after kissing his girlfriend who had just eaten Haagen Dasz ice cream, which is made with peanut oil. And not in that "oh, I heard this!" kind of way, but in that 'I saw this" kind of way.

So, it's not all *that* urban legendy. :P

And that is, indeed, one of the primary problems with having a boyfriend.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-01 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thelastrobot.livejournal.com
The problem with girlfriends is all the holes I've had to dig.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allah-sulu.livejournal.com
My wife already has enough holes for me.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 12:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thelastrobot.livejournal.com
Yeah, my wife didn't like my girlfriends. I'm always cleaning up her mess, don't get me started!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-01 11:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dindin.livejournal.com
Not an urban legend at all, unforunately. (http://www.google.com/search?q=girl+dies+kissing+boyfriend+allergic+to+peanuts&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official) File under shocking, but true.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-01 11:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dindin.livejournal.com
So not exactly correct, but not exactly an urban legend.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-01 11:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auryn29a.livejournal.com
Ayup. Looks like you have a few more years before you need to start polishing that shotgun on your front step.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 12:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cktraveler.livejournal.com
*applauds*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 12:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mooseloon.livejournal.com
Not an urban legend - Some people are so sensitive that they can react if someone who has eaten something with peanuts in it BREATHES NEAR them.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 12:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texmorgan.livejournal.com
I think you can breathe a sigh of relief for at least the next few years. Remember, all you have to do is get her out of your house and into college and the rest of the boy problem is hers to deal with ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texmorgan.livejournal.com
Hahaha. I'm so glad I have at least a few years before I have the possibility of having a kid.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
Hrm.

I kind of have a problem with the term "urban legend" there - as it wasn't - it was a mis-reported case.
Urban legends by definition are always "friend of a friend" or "know someone who knows this guy who" - not major news agencies reporting something incorrectly.

That said - as the mom of a daughter with a DEADLY peanut allergy - and sister to a brother who has survived many an ER trip due to the same - in that particular case, it's more that it didn't happen to her, not that it couldn't happen.

I say this, because I know for a fact that a kiss from someone who had eaten peanut butter HAS in fact, sent my older brother to the ER after use of an epi-pen - and that he could've died from it.
Granted, not 9 hour later, but within an hour from the time she ingested it.

Would you please do me a personal favor and edit that phrase?
Rather than "urban legend" use something like "misreported story" - because honestly? I face enough of an uphill battle trying to get people to understand that yes, Kira's peanut allergy is severe enough that having even trace amounts ingested can kill her without having people think that just because it turned out *not* to be the case in the story you're talking about, it means it can't happen.

It can.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 01:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
p.s. please forgive the run-on sentences and general incoherency... it's a rather emotional topic for me... I get a bit to upset to self-edit.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
I agree to a point on the comment editing - although I'm an advocate for "time limited edit" - as found elsewhere on the 'net...
Because if you hit post, and then wish to edit in say, the first couple of minutes, it's usually due to an error in your thinking or writing.
But the ability to edit past that leaves open the whole horror of debate-threads wherein someone says X, someone replies not-X, and the original poster edits first comment to Y and posts "I didn't say X - I said Y!"

:P

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
thank you!!

I'm probably a touch oversensitive about it right now - because when we were touring preschools last week, I had one "director" who the following conversation took place with:

Me: what's your nut/peanut policy - because my daughter has a deadly allergy to peanuts
Her: oh, we don't really have a policy - but we seldom have peanut butter here - and if we did, we just wouldn't give it to her
Me: um, no - her allergy is a bit more severe than that...
Her: [interrupting] Oh well it won't really be an issue, we almost never have peanut butter here - and we'd take her picture and put it up in the kitchen and if the other kids had peanut butter, we just wouldn't give it to her...
Me: Let me put this bluntly - if another child has peanut butter and my daughter *touches* that child - she will end up in the ER at the least, possibly dead at the worst. It isn't just a matter of not giving it to her.
Her: Oh well... like I said, we almost never have it here - so I'm sure she'd be fine.

At which point I gave up and we walked out - given that it seemed pointless to explain to her that eating a chocolate chip cookie a friend gave her at school a couple of weeks ago - which must've had trace amounts of peanuts (read the back of a Nestle Tollhouse package nowadays) gave her hives on her chest, back and thighs that required round the clock Benadryl, steroidal cream, oatmeal baths, and kept her home for 2 days and out of school until the next Monday.

It's seriously terrifying. And yet, public awareness of the reality of the allergy is seriously lacking. :(

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
Actually, thanks to the Food Allergy Labeling and Consumer Protection Act passed in 2004, all packaged foods with the "5 biggies" were required by law to have the warning labels by 2006...

Hence the sudden upsurge in "processed on machinery that processes" warnings and the like.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 06:31 am (UTC)
phantom_wolfboy: (humour)
From: [personal profile] phantom_wolfboy
"So don't go into politics . . ."

Or, apparantly, date. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-02 08:40 am (UTC)
tablesaw: Sketch of an antique tablesaw (Antigua)
From: [personal profile] tablesaw
You've been letting her watch too many horror movies.

Profile

yendi: (Default)
yendi

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags