Dear Roger Clemens:
Dec. 13th, 2007 07:08 pmThank you for your application. It was very amusing.
Love,
The MLB Hall of Fame (five years hence)
Seriously, the Mitchell Report is simply fascinating to read, along with the assorted denials, dodges, and bullshit. Selig's attempts to present himself as a strong and blameless leader, alone, are worth watching.
The Mets fan in me is happy to see that it's mostly ex-Mets (and given the supposed leaks of the report to teams, I'm a lot less surprised that Paul Lo Duca wasn't asked back). Then again, the vast number of players who used to be in the organization is disappointing. And there's nothing to say that this isn't the tip of the iceberg.
I'm surprised at Pettitte,and at Matt Franco (being Kurt Russell's nephew used to stand for integrity, dammit!). Not at Segui or Tejada. Dykstra and Hundley were so obviously juiced, their names are almost superfluous. And I do feel a sense of schadenfreude over the naming of John Rocker.
Biggest name I expected to see but didn't: Pujols, of course.
Overally, I'm still processing all the info, but I'm fascinated.
Love,
The MLB Hall of Fame (five years hence)
Seriously, the Mitchell Report is simply fascinating to read, along with the assorted denials, dodges, and bullshit. Selig's attempts to present himself as a strong and blameless leader, alone, are worth watching.
The Mets fan in me is happy to see that it's mostly ex-Mets (and given the supposed leaks of the report to teams, I'm a lot less surprised that Paul Lo Duca wasn't asked back). Then again, the vast number of players who used to be in the organization is disappointing. And there's nothing to say that this isn't the tip of the iceberg.
I'm surprised at Pettitte,and at Matt Franco (being Kurt Russell's nephew used to stand for integrity, dammit!). Not at Segui or Tejada. Dykstra and Hundley were so obviously juiced, their names are almost superfluous. And I do feel a sense of schadenfreude over the naming of John Rocker.
Biggest name I expected to see but didn't: Pujols, of course.
Overally, I'm still processing all the info, but I'm fascinated.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 12:09 am (UTC)Why did these guys write checks to their drug dealers???
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 12:18 am (UTC)And not just checks! Paul Lo Duca wrote a nice thank-you note on Dodger stationery!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 09:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 12:23 am (UTC)I'm not. The primary source for most of what's in the report is an ex-Mets clubhouse guy who's trying to get his prison sentenced reduced. There are no test results, and all the report says is what players were doing years ago before MLB instituted the current steroid policy. Yawn and yawn.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 01:29 am (UTC)And a second cluster is guys who were taking HGH while they were rehabbing, presumably because they thought it would help them recover from injuries or surgeries.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 12:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 01:01 am (UTC)So is Barry Bonds.
I do not buy that argument.
Then again, I would vote for Pete Rose and Shoeless Joe Jackson.
If it's an issue, then every reporter who snorted coke needs to take himself off the BBWA election committee.
Oh, and I have a little trouble with the only source being a guy who is trying to save his own ass.
Yeah, I am eccentric.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 01:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 01:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 03:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 03:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 07:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 03:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 09:52 am (UTC)then again, sucks to be the astros and the brewers. nothing beats getting a player and then finding out he did the roids...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 03:11 pm (UTC)Except for the Mets, who found out a player did the 'roids, and signed him to an insane contract anyway (thankfully, we traded Mota away).