yendi: (Fuck Polanski)
[personal profile] yendi
[Warning: This post will contain a lot of profanity, and has the potential to be triggery, as I'll be discussing rapist and occasional filmmaker Roman Polanski*]

One things that's amazing about the arrest of child rapist Polanski is how many people in this world are just plain assholes.

Here's one of CNN's article about it.

Let's take a look at two of the tools quoted here.

First, there's professional turd-swallower and French culture and communications minister Frederic Mitterrand, who "wants to remind everyone that Roman Polanski benefits from great general esteem" and has "exceptional artistic creation and human qualities."

Yes, folks, toad-fucker and goat-felcher Mitterand believes that it's perfectly fucking okay to rape a thirteen-year-old girl if you're brilliant artist. Because, you know, that's the price of fame.

Later, Mitterrand tells us that French President Nicolas Sarkozy "shares his hope for a rapid resolution to the situation which would allow Roman Polanski to rejoin his family as quickly as possible." I'll give Sarkozy the benefit of the doubt and assume that Mitterand is libeling him here.

Mitterrand finishes up by telling us that he "greatly regrets that Mr. Polanski has had yet another difficulty added to an already turbulent existence." Yeah, because, you know, bad shit happening makes it okay to rape a child. And this is a difficulty that was "added?" As in, brought out by an external source? Like someone went up to poor, innocent Polanski and just arrested him for no reason at all? Seriously, if Mitterrand even has a moral compass, it's shoved too far up his nether oriface to even be visible.

Then there's Polanski hanger-on and Penthouse photographer Otto Weisser, who in that same article calls raping a child "one little mistake."

Really.

This scumsucker of an alleged human being is equating child rape with a shoplifting charge.

It gets worse.

There's a petition of assholes wanting -- no, demanding -- that Polanksi be freed, as if he's some sort of political prisoner. The fucktard parade includes Woody Allen (whose own skeevishness, of course, is legendary), Darren Aronofsky, Alexandre Arcady, Stephen Frears, Buck Henry, Wong Kar Waï, John Landis, David Lynch, Julian Schnabel, Martin Scorsese, Wim Wenders, Terry Gilliam, and more.

Which goes to show that talent is in no way grounded in morality, or even in humanity..

There are frequently discussions -- especially in the sci-fi communities -- about how to balance real-world obnoxiousness on the part of a creator with the desire to read/listen to/watch something impressive. Everyone, of course, has their own line. This one's well past mine. The folks listed above are incredibly talented (as is Polanski himself, of course). There are, however, always, even in a world loosely governed by Sturgeon's Law, going to be more talented creators and creations than there is ever time to see (or read, or listen to).

None of this, of course, takes away the feelings I experienced when first viewing Chinatown (shown in a high school class before I knew anything about the director), Annie Hall, The Wrestler, or Kentucky Fried Movie. But there are better ways to spend what little money I have than on supporting complete and utter scum like these people.

OBdisclaimer: No I'm not "boycotting" anyone. That's an organized action designed to have an impact. I'm simply noting that these people crossed a line that's unacceptable to me.

*Yes, when you rape someone, that is what defines you from that day forward. Anything else you do is secondary.
Page 1 of 7 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aiela.livejournal.com
I'm really torn on this - obviously what he did was horrible, and having the financial wherewithall to hide from your crime for 30 years shouldn't absolve you of it in some sort of "but it was so loooooong ago" bullshit.

Except the victim herself really wants this to go away, and actually petitioned the courts earlier this year to drop the charges so that she wouldn't have to deal with it anymore.

Except that leads us back to my first point...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mgrasso.livejournal.com
When it was announced he was arrested, I saw this sort of thing coming, kind of like how everything slows down right before you're in a car accident?

It stuns me that so many people could believe that his 30+ year flight from justice is anything but a travesty and a mistake.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aiela.livejournal.com
Oh, definitely. Which is why I said it leads back to "he shouldn't get away with it just because he managed to stay out of reach for so long."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com
Are ALL the petitioners men? That's what jumps out at me...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murnkay.livejournal.com
Maybe he can particpate in The Rape tunnel (http://bit.ly/uNOMb) (Want misguided WHAT THE HOLY FUCK? Here it is.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murnkay.livejournal.com
Tilda Swinton is one of them last I knew. And Whoppi Goldberg on the View today was defending him.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
"but you fuck one goat"

One small word in defense of Polanski (although I shouldn't say anything I know), it was statuatory rape. And if he had done it in Nebraska it wouldn't even have been that (yeah I looked up age of consent across the 50 states once. Sue me.) The fact that legally, a girl that's aged 13 is not allowed to give consent for sex doesn't mean that it was the same as if he forced her.

And the victim is one of the people that thinks he should be released. Again, you can't retroactively give consent for what your 13 year old self will get into.

I know that if Sigourney Weaver had raped me in that way when I was 13, I would not have complained or pressed charges. I would have been most grateful.

Of course, statuatory rape laws serve a purpose and even though they get abused (like that football player who went to jail for rape because he had consensual sex with his 16 year old girlfriend when he was 18 - on camera sadly) they shouldn't be minimized. Myspace creeps need to have boundaries.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
But what if it was consensual in her mind? Not legally consensual obviously, but consensual nonetheless.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
Did you have sex before the legal age of consent? Did you have sex with someone who wasn't the legal age of consent when you were? If you answered yes to either question, would you turn someone in for rape?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mgrasso.livejournal.com
Wait, wait. He drugged her and gave her alcohol. Granted, he pled away those charges, but they're in the public record. It happened.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magenta-girl.livejournal.com
But if you read the girl's account, she was given champagne, fed quaaludes, and cried and said no, and faked an asthma attack to get him to stop. That sounds like more than statutory rape.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
Again. Who hasn't had sex under the influence of alcohol? It's creepy but I am still not convinced that it's anything but statuatory.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murnkay.livejournal.com
Non-graphic, art installation, dead serious, utter batshit crazy. So I don't see why NOT.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mgrasso.livejournal.com
You know, I think in a lot of ways, the leniency of rape laws in the late 70s is just as infuriating as Polanski thinking he could be above the law and going on the lam. It's frightening that he could get a plea deal on drugging a 13-year-old and have the charges dropped to a pretty innocuous level. I am willing to guess that in most states this sort of plea deal for a rapist these days would be very, very difficult.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
Ok. The crying and saying no part is more important. Ok. Never mind. I'll check out the account. Now I'm convinced that it was more than just statuatory - probably.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mgrasso.livejournal.com
Wow. Okay.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murnkay.livejournal.com
You know I was surprised by the Whoopi defending him bit but then I remembered Ted Dansen in blackface. So, maybe I shouldn't be shocked?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murnkay.livejournal.com
"I am willing to guess that in most states this sort of plea deal for a rapist these days would be very, very difficult."

Not if you're FAMOUS.
Page 1 of 7 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>

Profile

yendi: (Default)
yendi

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags