yendi: (Grammar. Syntax.)
[personal profile] yendi
I suspect that, at some point, you were told that adverbs are bad (which isn't necessarily correct to begin with, of course; adverbs are tools, and have their uses) . You therefore* decided to expunge them from your novel.

Please understand that the proper way to remove adverbs is to erase them entirely (or rework the sentences). Simply removing the "ly" at the end of a word doesn't remove the adverb; it just makes you look foolish.

*Okay, an adverb-adverse author wouldn't "therefore" decide anything.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadesong.livejournal.com
This is the same one you've been reading? With the viscous teeth?
Edited Date: 2009-11-20 01:36 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadesong.livejournal.com
We should be doing an Eye of Argon-style dramatic reading of this.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 01:53 pm (UTC)
ext_4772: (Palindromes!)
From: [identity profile] chris-walsh.livejournal.com
Do James Ellory. No adverbs, more f-bombs.

(I still boggle at how one book reviewer worked out that The Cold Six Thousand's average sentence length was 4 words. For a whole novel.)

I like to pretend that maybe there's a limited supply of adverbs, and authors depleted them in the early 20th century so we have to be sparing with them now.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slipjig.livejournal.com
*hides head* Oh, ye gods, say it ain't so.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 01:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luis-mw.livejournal.com
Do post some prime examples, quick

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 01:54 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 02:39 pm (UTC)
gingicat: deep purple lilacs, some buds, some open (Default)
From: [personal profile] gingicat
Isn't that the sort of thing editors are supposed to catch *before* it goes to publication?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rubian77.livejournal.com
NYARGH. And this is why I think there should be an actual specialized degree for people who want to get into editing/proofreading/professional writing.

(An "English" degree, from personal experience, is about knowing useless facts about literature written in the English language. Nothing about Grammar.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 03:49 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-21 02:32 pm (UTC)

Little Slugs

Date: 2009-11-20 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forioscribe.livejournal.com
As a former copywriter for the subsidiary rights department of Doubleday back when their offices were at 277 Park Avenue in New York, I became familiar with editors. For the most part they are dull, plodding, unimaginative, cowering, fearful little slugs who have an elevated opinion of themselves.

They are in denial of the central fact of trade publishing: Virtually EVERY first-time book on the Best Seller lists were previously rejected by 25 to 50 houses.

No editor knows what will sell. They all believe, however, they do.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 04:58 pm (UTC)
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)
From: [personal profile] rosefox
I hope this isn't one of mine!

BTW, did the present for [livejournal.com profile] shadesong arrive safely in the last package?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-20 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malinaldarose.livejournal.com
Not even viciously expunged, then?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-21 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] captain18.livejournal.com
Your icon totally made me think of Bob the Angry Flower's Guide to the Apostrophe (http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif).
Edited Date: 2009-11-21 02:40 pm (UTC)

Profile

yendi: (Default)
yendi

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags