You annotated WHAT?!?
Aug. 1st, 2002 09:07 amSo the Sci-Fi Book club mailer came yesterday.
The first flyer we looked through had The Annotated Alice.
I've got this, and it's wonderful. If ever a book deserved annotation, it's Alice. And Martin Gardner does it justice.
Next to it was The Annotated Flatland. I don't own this one, but it certainly deserves annotation (although, as a much tinier book, doesn't have the same instant "spend the $20 and buy it" appeal). It's a classic.
(Although it wasn't listed, I own the Annotated Wizard of Oz. This book is a bit more dubious -- it's a wonderful book, and a classic, but it's less subtle than the other two -- many of the annotations are major stretches.)
But then, later in the catalog, there was the kicker:
Dragonlance: The Annotated Chronicles.
You. Must. Be. Shitting. Me.
They fucking annotated Dragonlance? Weis and Hickman, the writers who practically redefined "hack" for an entire generation?
There is way too much crack in the drinking water at Wizards.
What the fuck will they annotate?
"Hickman's use of a lich in this scene is highly representative of his own confused sexuality, with his Mormon faith forcing him to contain his inner homosexual."
"Weis, in this scene, uses a skeleton as a metaphor for dead people who come back to life. Oh, wait. It's not a metaphor. They are dead people coming back to life."
Anyone expecting the Annotated Xanth next?
The first flyer we looked through had The Annotated Alice.
I've got this, and it's wonderful. If ever a book deserved annotation, it's Alice. And Martin Gardner does it justice.
Next to it was The Annotated Flatland. I don't own this one, but it certainly deserves annotation (although, as a much tinier book, doesn't have the same instant "spend the $20 and buy it" appeal). It's a classic.
(Although it wasn't listed, I own the Annotated Wizard of Oz. This book is a bit more dubious -- it's a wonderful book, and a classic, but it's less subtle than the other two -- many of the annotations are major stretches.)
But then, later in the catalog, there was the kicker:
Dragonlance: The Annotated Chronicles.
You. Must. Be. Shitting. Me.
They fucking annotated Dragonlance? Weis and Hickman, the writers who practically redefined "hack" for an entire generation?
There is way too much crack in the drinking water at Wizards.
What the fuck will they annotate?
"Hickman's use of a lich in this scene is highly representative of his own confused sexuality, with his Mormon faith forcing him to contain his inner homosexual."
"Weis, in this scene, uses a skeleton as a metaphor for dead people who come back to life. Oh, wait. It's not a metaphor. They are dead people coming back to life."
Anyone expecting the Annotated Xanth next?
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 06:17 am (UTC)Ow.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 06:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 07:11 am (UTC)I'm new to this geek stuff.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 07:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 07:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 07:43 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-01 08:19 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-01 08:32 am (UTC)But the book really is fun. You just have to remember to read the plays out loud. The more dramatic flourishes, the better. Shakespeare was meant to be performed, experienced, not read.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 07:27 am (UTC)Yuk yuk....
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 07:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 07:42 am (UTC)1. Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles (here we see Rice's gay messianic complex becoming evident...)
2. Merecedes Lackey
3. Robert Asprin's Myth books (here we see a clear reference to Bob Hope's line in Road to Zanzibar )
And why the Frick doesn't someone annotate a Zelazny book? Now THAT would be cool...
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 08:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 08:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 08:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 10:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 11:49 am (UTC)I lost a lot of respect for Anthony during that incident. He'd always claimed to be somebody to whom integrity was important, which I found to be a total lie. I hadn't read most of his stuff in years, but I will never again pick up another book he's written after the attitude he gave me.
cheers,
Phil
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 12:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 12:42 pm (UTC)cheers,
Phil
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 12:20 pm (UTC)Storm Constantine annotated by a bible-thumper?
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 12:51 pm (UTC)I'd place Gor with Misty Lackey -- the quality issues are so severe, that the misogynistic stuff is almost secondary.
Although Lackey writing in the world of Gor is something I might be willing to read. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 01:40 pm (UTC)How about Sheri Tepper writing in Gor?
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-01 05:12 pm (UTC)The idea of giving Lackey any more chances repulses me. There are too many good books out there for me to bother wasting any more time on her.
Sheri on Gor would be interesting. :-)