(no subject)
Sep. 15th, 2002 12:30 pmI can be like a pitbull when it comes to certain things. Annoy me, and I never let it go.
Which reminds me that it's been a long time since I griped about this particular topic:
How the fuck does "Independence Day" lead to the acronym "ID4?" I mean, if the producers assault us with three sequels to one of the vilest wastes of film to ever hit the screen, I could see it. But not for the first flick.
Which reminds me that it's been a long time since I griped about this particular topic:
How the fuck does "Independence Day" lead to the acronym "ID4?" I mean, if the producers assault us with three sequels to one of the vilest wastes of film to ever hit the screen, I could see it. But not for the first flick.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 09:54 am (UTC)That movie had some of the best teasers and trailers and buildup that I have EVER seen.. and as a sheer popcorn movie.. it kicked ass.. I think the hell out of movies so its a little harder for me to really say I liked it.. but for what it was I thought it worked..
Still.. ID4 doesn't make an ounce of sense.. never has..
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 12:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 05:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 10:01 am (UTC)Two words: Marketing Morons.
But I liked the movie. Just watched it last week, in fact. Does that make me a Bad Person?
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 10:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 10:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 12:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 10:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 10:45 am (UTC)And they saved the dog because of the audience reaction. The crowd in my theater went wild when the dog made it into that little closet safely... Marketing morons.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 12:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 08:57 pm (UTC)It's a bad event movie, but I find it one of the more entertaining bad event movies.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 10:33 am (UTC)It was better than "Mars Attacks!", though (which had such potential).
Of course, in my opinion, Independence Day, Mars Attacks!, and Armageddon were better than "Signs." *gdr*
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 12:52 pm (UTC)And there hasn't been a worse movie than Armageddon. Ever.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 01:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 02:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 03:33 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-09-15 02:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 04:01 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-09-15 10:03 pm (UTC)I can't imagine reading "Bartleby the Scrivener" and thinking "Gee, that would make a TERRIFIC films!" *G*
I'm sure we can find *something* to agree on. Let's see...
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 10:50 am (UTC)But yeah, it looks good on a poster, and sounds good when you say it. Maybe the marketeers had just seen CB3 or something. It's cool, it's hip, yadda yadda.
I'm guessing they're the same folks who did MIIB.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 12:54 pm (UTC)Yeah, I'd forgotten about MIIB.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 11:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 12:57 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-09-16 06:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 01:30 pm (UTC)Plus it makes for the best drinking game ever. Just take a drink everytime something totally improbable happens, and you'll be almost dead of alcohol poisoning by the end.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 01:50 pm (UTC)And I much prefer the Mission: Impossible approach on computing -- good guys use Macs, scum use Windows.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-15 08:53 pm (UTC)If something differs from the book, drink.
If something historically impossible happens, drink twice.
If the red bird shows up to Announce a Metaphor, drink three times.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-16 10:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-09-16 11:14 am (UTC)